BETZ vs. VCR
BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and VCR (Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - BETZ tracks the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index while VCR tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BETZ returned -8.45%/yr vs 6.49%/yr for VCR. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VCR.
Performance
BETZ vs. VCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than VCR's 0.01% return.
BETZ
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -6.63%
- 1Y
- -5.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- -8.45%
- 10Y*
- —
VCR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 11.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.55%
BETZ vs. VCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -9.29% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -42.02% | -3.91% | 60.54% |
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.01% | 5.77% | 24.27% | 40.38% | -35.15% | 24.86% | 41.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and VCR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between BETZ and VCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. VCR — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
VCR
BETZ vs. VCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BETZ | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | 0.61 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | 0.97 | -1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.12 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 0.73 | -0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 2.28 | -2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BETZ | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 0.61 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 | 0.27 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.51 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. VCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, roughly equal to the maximum VCR drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and VCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -61.54% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -15.59% | -13.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | -27.36% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.35% | -39.20% | -21.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.64% | -4.54% | -34.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.81% | -9.40% | -24.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.93% | 4.96% | +11.97% |
Volatility
BETZ vs. VCR - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) have volatilities of 5.46% and 5.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | VCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 5.22% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.77% | 13.06% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 18.46% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 23.99% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.95% | 22.41% | +5.54% |
BETZ vs. VCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VCR's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
BETZ vs. VCR - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than VCR's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.04% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETZ and VCR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BETZ has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to VCR (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs VCR's -61.54%.
On 5-year performance, VCR leads with 6.49% vs -8.45% for BETZ. On fees, VCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VCR has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VCR has performed better with a 6.49% return vs -8.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.
BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.04%, compared with 0.73% for VCR.
BETZ tracks Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.10% for VCR.
VCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETZ and VCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer