PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BETZ vs. TRUD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BETZ vs. TRUD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and TRUD (VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. BETZ is passively managed, while TRUD is actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for TRUD.

Performance

BETZ vs. TRUD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF (TRUD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -8.87% return, which is significantly lower than TRUD's 0.20% return.

BETZ

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.36%
6M
2.90%
YTD
-8.87%
1Y
-16.95%
3Y*
3.15%
5Y*
-5.84%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
4.39%

TRUD

1D
6.17%
1M
0.84%
6M
-1.50%
YTD
0.20%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

BETZ

Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
$205.48K$310.34K$782.30K

TRUD

VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF
$4.45M$2.54M$1.74M

BETZ vs. TRUD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF		-8.87%-9.73%
TRUD
VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF		0.20%6.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and TRUD is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.45

BETZ vs. TRUD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
BETZ
TRUD

Consumer Cyclical

77.1%
37.9%

Technology

8.6%
0.1%

Communication Services

3.9%
0.1%

Industrials

2.8%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.0%
61.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

BETZ
77.1%
TRUD
37.9%

Technology

BETZ
8.6%
TRUD
0.1%

Communication Services

BETZ
3.9%
TRUD
0.1%

Industrials

BETZ
2.8%
TRUD
0.0%

Financial Services

BETZ
0.0%
TRUD
61.9%

Basic Materials

BETZ

-

TRUD

-

Consumer Defensive

BETZ

-

TRUD

-

Energy

BETZ

-

TRUD

-

Healthcare

BETZ

-

TRUD

-

Real Estate

BETZ

-

TRUD

-

Utilities

BETZ

-

TRUD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF

VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF

Often compared with BETZ:
BETZ vs. FDISBETZ vs. ODDSBETZ vs. MGMBETZ vs. HTECBETZ vs. SPYBETZ vs. QQQBETZ vs. BRK-B
Often compared with TRUD:
TRUD vs. GXPDTRUD vs. TMHTRUD vs. IYCTRUD vs. XLYTRUD vs. MOATTRUD vs. RKNGTRUD vs. DVXY

Return for Risk

BETZ vs. TRUD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
BETZ
BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
TRUD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BETZ vs. TRUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF (TRUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

BETZTRUDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.83

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-1.09

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

—

—

BETZ vs. TRUD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BETZ vs. TRUD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than TRUD's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and TRUD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BETZTRUDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.82%

-15.96%

-44.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.20%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.20%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.79%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.35%

-4.73%

-33.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-4.76%

-29.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.92%

—

—

Volatility

BETZ vs. TRUD - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BETZTRUDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.04%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.17%

22.23%

-1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.97%

22.23%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.85%

22.23%

+5.62%

BETZ vs. TRUD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUD's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETZ vs. TRUD - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than TRUD's 0.48% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF		5.02%4.57%0.86%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%
TRUD
VanEck Consumer Discretionary TruSector ETF		0.48%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

BETZ and TRUD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUD is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUD is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.

BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 0.48% for TRUD.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.16% for TRUD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BETZ and TRUD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer