BETZ vs. PLTW
BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. BETZ is passively managed, while PLTW is actively managed. Over the past year, BETZ returned -16.95% vs -30.37% for PLTW. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.
Performance
BETZ vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -8.87% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -38.54% return.
BETZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- -8.87%
- 1Y
- -16.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- -5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
PLTW
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -5.95%
- 6M
- -21.93%
- YTD
- -38.54%
- 1Y
- -30.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -15.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.48K | $310.34K | $782.30K | |
| $2.46M | $2.75M | $3.76M |
BETZ vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -8.87% | 1.08% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -38.54% | 28.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and PLTW is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.39 |
The correlation between BETZ and PLTW shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BETZ vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BETZ
PLTW
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
BETZ
PLTW
-
Technology
BETZ
PLTW
Communication Services
BETZ
PLTW
-
Industrials
BETZ
PLTW
-
Financial Services
BETZ
PLTW
-
Basic Materials
BETZ
-
PLTW
-
Consumer Defensive
BETZ
-
PLTW
-
Energy
BETZ
-
PLTW
-
Healthcare
BETZ
-
PLTW
-
Real Estate
BETZ
-
PLTW
-
Utilities
BETZ
-
PLTW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
PLTW
BETZ vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETZ | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.95 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | -0.56 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | -1.02 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than PLTW's maximum drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and PLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -57.27% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -57.27% | +28.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.35% | -49.73% | +11.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -25.20% | -8.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.92% | 31.48% | -12.56% |
Volatility
BETZ vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 5.96%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 15.73%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 15.73% | -9.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 48.95% | -31.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.17% | 62.54% | -41.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 73.53% | -46.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.85% | 73.53% | -45.68% |
BETZ vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BETZ vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than PLTW's 138.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.02% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 138.40% | 72.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETZ and PLTW have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTW has higher volatility (15.73%) compared to BETZ (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs PLTW's -57.27%.
On 1-year performance, BETZ leads with -16.95% vs -30.37% for PLTW. On fees, BETZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BETZ has performed better with a -16.95% return vs -30.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BETZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.
PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 138.40%, compared with 5.02% for BETZ.
BETZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.99% for PLTW.
PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETZ and PLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer