BETZ vs. MAGS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. BETZ is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BETZ returned 3.15%/yr vs 28.94%/yr for MAGS. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

BETZ vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BETZ

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 2.90%
• YTD: -8.87%
• 1Y: -16.95%
• 3Y*: 3.15%
• 5Y*: -5.84%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.39%

MAGS

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: 1.32%
• 6M: -0.29%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 17.98%
• 3Y*: 28.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	$205.48K	$310.34K	$782.30K
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	$254.73M	$303.60M	$278.63M

BETZ vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	-8.87%	15.75%	10.22%	7.50%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	0.00%	22.99%	63.97%	35.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and MAGS is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023	0.48

BETZ vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BETZ	MAGS
Consumer Cyclical	77.1%	6.2%
Technology	8.6%	13.0%
Communication Services	3.9%	6.5%
Industrials	2.8%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BETZ vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BETZ

BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 4
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 27
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BETZ vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETZ	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.83	0.64	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.09	1.01	-2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.12	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	0.77	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.93	2.26	-3.19

BETZ vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETZ and MAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BETZ vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETZ	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.82%	-29.91%	-30.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.20%	-18.62%	-10.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.20%	-29.91%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.35%	-7.02%	-31.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	-4.86%	-29.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.92%	6.31%	+12.61%

Volatility

BETZ vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 5.96%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETZ	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.96%	8.02%	-2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.04%	17.37%	-0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.17%	22.30%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.97%	26.09%	+0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.85%	26.09%	+1.76%

BETZ vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETZ vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than MAGS's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	5.02%	4.57%	0.86%	0.00%	0.66%	0.00%	0.28%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.48%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETZ and MAGS in my portfolio?

BETZ and MAGS have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETZ or MAGS?

MAGS has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to BETZ (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs MAGS's -29.91%.

Which ETF is better, BETZ or MAGS?

On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 28.94% vs 3.15% for BETZ. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETZ or MAGS?

Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 28.94% return vs 3.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETZ or MAGS?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETZ or MAGS?

BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 1.48% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between BETZ and MAGS?

BETZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while MAGS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.30% for MAGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.