BEDY vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. BEDY is actively managed, while GCOW is passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BEDY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

BEDY vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 7.34% return.

BEDY

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 2.34%
• YTD: 12.52%
• 6M: 11.68%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GCOW

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -6.00%
• YTD: 7.34%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 21.14%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 11.72%
• 10Y*: 9.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEDY vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	12.52%	1.45%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	7.34%	1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between BEDY and GCOW is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025	0.53

Return for Risk

BEDY vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEDY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 60
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEDY vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEDY	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.91	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.74	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.33	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.42	—

Drawdowns

BEDY vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEDY	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-37.64%	+31.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	-6.93%	+6.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-5.83%	+4.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BEDY	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.89%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.11%	11.09%	+1.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.11%	13.50%	-1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.11%	16.03%	-3.92%

BEDY vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEDY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEDY vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than GCOW's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	3.29%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.90%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEDY and GCOW in my portfolio?

BEDY and GCOW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BEDY or GCOW?

On fees, BEDY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEDY or GCOW?

BEDY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEDY or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 3.29% for BEDY.

What is the main difference between BEDY and GCOW?

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BEDY and 0.60% for GCOW.