BEDY vs. BKMC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC).

BEDY and BKMC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BEDY is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025. BKMC is a passively managed fund by BNY Mellon that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2020.

Performance

BEDY vs. BKMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BEDY vs. BKMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	3.56%	1.62%
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	2.04%	-0.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly higher than BKMC's 2.04% return.

BEDY

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -3.21%
• YTD: 3.56%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BKMC

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -5.83%
• YTD: 2.04%
• 6M: 2.84%
• 1Y: 17.25%
• 3Y*: 12.70%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEDY vs. BKMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEDY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BKMC's 0.04% expense ratio.

BEDY

BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

BKMC

BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF

Return for Risk

BEDY vs. BKMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKMC

BKMC Risk / Return Rank: 45
BKMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BKMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BKMC Omega Ratio Rank: 43
BKMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
BKMC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEDY vs. BKMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEDY	BKMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	0.76	+0.70

Correlation

The correlation between BEDY and BKMC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BEDY vs. BKMC - Dividend Comparison

BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than BKMC's 1.51% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	2.14%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	1.51%	1.35%	1.54%	1.38%	1.63%	1.15%	0.86%

Drawdowns

BEDY vs. BKMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum BKMC drawdown of -25.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and BKMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEDY	BKMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-25.02%	+18.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.99%	-6.34%	+2.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.55%	-6.68%	+5.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BEDY	BKMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.42%	20.92%	-8.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.42%	18.73%	-6.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.42%	19.28%	-6.86%