BEDY vs. FDL
BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. BEDY is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BEDY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
BEDY vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 16.02% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 18.16% return.
BEDY
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- YTD
- 16.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 18.16%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.95M | $1.66M | $1.56M | |
| $52.24M | $50.06M | $42.95M |
BEDY vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 16.02% | 1.45% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 18.16% | 1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEDY and FDL is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEDY vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
BEDY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDL
BEDY vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEDY | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEDY vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEDY | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -65.93% | +59.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -1.96% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.14% | -9.59% | +8.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.81% | — |
Volatility
BEDY vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEDY | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 11.95% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.77% | 14.44% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.77% | 17.16% | -5.39% |
BEDY vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEDY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEDY vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than FDL's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 3.87% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.59% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEDY and FDL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BEDY.
BEDY has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 3.59% for FDL.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BEDY and 0.43% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for BEDY and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer