PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDYN vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDYN vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDYN achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.


BDYN

1D
-0.93%
1M
-0.14%
6M
6.27%
YTD
7.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POW

1D
-3.68%
1M
-13.79%
6M
25.01%
YTD
35.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDYN vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BDYN and POW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDYN vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDYN vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BDYN vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDYN drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDYN and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDYNPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-20.28%

+9.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-20.28%

+19.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-4.56%

+2.81%

Volatility

BDYN vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDYNPOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

33.06%

-18.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.63%

33.06%

-18.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

33.06%

-18.43%

BDYN vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDYN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDYN vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

BDYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BDYN and POW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDYN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDYN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

BDYN has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

BDYN is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDYN and 0.75% for POW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDYN and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer