BDYN vs. BLCR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BDYN (iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDYN is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while BLCR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BDYN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

BDYN vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDYN achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 15.35% return.

BDYN

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -0.14%
• 6M: 6.27%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -2.52%
• 6M: 12.15%
• YTD: 15.35%
• 1Y: 34.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDYN vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF	7.89%	3.61%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	15.35%	6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BDYN and BLCR is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025	0.88

BDYN vs. BLCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BDYN	BLCR
Technology	33.2%	34.3%
Industrials	12.1%	13.7%
Financial Services	11.5%	12.5%
Communication Services	10.7%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	11.1%
Healthcare	9.6%	7.6%
Energy	5.8%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	-
Utilities	1.9%	1.6%
Basic Materials	1.4%	2.2%
Real Estate	0.2%	-

Return for Risk

BDYN vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDYN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 80
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDYN vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDYN	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.06	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.66	—

Drawdowns

BDYN vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDYN drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDYN and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDYN	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.85%	-21.29%	+10.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-3.88%	+2.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.75%	-2.20%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDYN	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.41%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.63%	16.65%	-2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.63%	17.63%	-3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.63%	17.63%	-3.00%

BDYN vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDYN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDYN vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

BDYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than BLCR's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF	2.02%	2.18%	0.00%	0.00%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.29%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDYN and BLCR in my portfolio?

BDYN and BLCR have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BDYN or BLCR?

On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDYN or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BDYN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDYN or BLCR?

BDYN has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 0.29% for BLCR.

What is the main difference between BDYN and BLCR?

BDYN is categorized as Global Equities, while BLCR is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDYN and 0.36% for BLCR.