BDYN vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BDYN (iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both Global Equities funds from iShares. BDYN is actively managed, while ACWI is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BDYN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

BDYN vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDYN achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return.

BDYN

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 5.01%
• YTD: 8.12%
• 6M: 8.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWI

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 12.96%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDYN vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF	8.12%	3.68%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	12.13%	4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BDYN and ACWI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025	0.96

BDYN vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BDYN	ACWI
Technology	30.5%	29.4%
Financial Services	11.6%	16.1%
Industrials	10.8%	10.9%
Communication Services	10.0%	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	9.3%
Healthcare	9.3%	8.1%
Energy	5.7%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	5.0%
Utilities	2.5%	2.6%
Basic Materials	1.3%	3.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

BDYN vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 66
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDYN vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDYN	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	0.43	+0.80

Drawdowns

BDYN vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDYN drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDYN and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDYN	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.85%	-56.00%	+45.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.73%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-0.83%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.80%	-8.61%	+6.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDYN	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.17%	12.78%	+1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.17%	16.05%	-1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.17%	17.11%	-2.94%

BDYN vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDYN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDYN vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

BDYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.38%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF	2.01%	2.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDYN and ACWI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, BDYN and ACWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BDYN or ACWI?

On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDYN or ACWI?

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BDYN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDYN or ACWI?

BDYN has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

What is the main difference between BDYN and ACWI?

Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDYN and 0.32% for ACWI.