PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDYN vs. HERD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDYN vs. HERD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDYN achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 12.44% return.


BDYN

1D
0.45%
1M
4.35%
YTD
8.61%
6M
9.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HERD

1D
0.35%
1M
2.67%
YTD
12.44%
6M
13.23%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDYN vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BDYN and HERD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.72

BDYN vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BDYN
HERD

Technology

30.5%
18.0%

Financial Services

11.6%
0.0%

Industrials

10.8%
13.4%

Communication Services

10.0%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
15.6%

Healthcare

9.3%
14.7%

Energy

5.7%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
8.2%

Utilities

2.5%
0.8%

Basic Materials

1.3%
4.7%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.3%

Technology

BDYN
30.5%
HERD
18.0%

Financial Services

BDYN
11.6%
HERD
0.0%

Industrials

BDYN
10.8%
HERD
13.4%

Communication Services

BDYN
10.0%
HERD
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BDYN
9.6%
HERD
15.6%

Healthcare

BDYN
9.3%
HERD
14.7%

Energy

BDYN
5.7%
HERD
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

BDYN
3.4%
HERD
8.2%

Utilities

BDYN
2.5%
HERD
0.8%

Basic Materials

BDYN
1.3%
HERD
4.7%

Real Estate

BDYN
0.1%
HERD
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDYN vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDYN

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDYN vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDYN vs. HERD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDYNHERDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.63

+0.64

Drawdowns

BDYN vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDYN drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum HERD drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDYN and HERD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDYNHERDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-39.41%

+28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.33%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-4.54%

+2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

Volatility

BDYN vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDYNHERDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

11.61%

+2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

17.76%

-3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.14%

20.49%

-6.35%

BDYN vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDYN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDYN vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison

BDYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than HERD's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BDYN
iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
2.00%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
3.12%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDYN and HERD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDYN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDYN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.

HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 2.00% for BDYN.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDYN and 0.73% for HERD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDYN and HERD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer