PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDVL vs. GKAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDVL vs. GKAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDVL achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly lower than GKAT's 9.70% return.


BDVL

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.91%
YTD
4.71%
6M
5.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GKAT

1D
-0.69%
1M
4.59%
YTD
9.70%
6M
12.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDVL vs. GKAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BDVL and GKAT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.71

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDVL vs. GKAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDVL vs. GKAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDVLGKATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

1.82

-0.80

Drawdowns

BDVL vs. GKAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum GKAT drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and GKAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDVLGKATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.71%

-10.41%

+2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.97%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-2.07%

+0.88%

Volatility

BDVL vs. GKAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDVLGKATDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.49%

11.97%

-2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.49%

11.97%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.49%

11.97%

-2.48%

BDVL vs. GKAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GKAT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDVL vs. GKAT - Dividend Comparison

BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than GKAT's 0.44% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BDVL and GKAT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GKAT.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.44% for GKAT.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Scharf Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 0.59% for GKAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDVL and GKAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer