PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GKAT vs. KAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GKAT vs. KAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and Scharf ETF (KAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GKAT achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than KAT's 1.12% return.


GKAT

1D
-0.28%
1M
4.93%
YTD
10.47%
6M
13.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KAT

1D
-0.76%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.12%
6M
2.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GKAT vs. KAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GKAT
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
10.47%6.04%
KAT
Scharf ETF
1.12%0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GKAT and KAT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GKAT vs. KAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and Scharf ETF (KAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GKAT vs. KAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GKATKATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.92

0.26

+1.66

Drawdowns

GKAT vs. KAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GKAT drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, which is greater than KAT's maximum drawdown of -9.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GKAT and KAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GKATKATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.41%

-9.25%

-1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-4.27%

+3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-3.19%

+1.11%

Volatility

GKAT vs. KAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GKATKATDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

10.47%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.97%

10.47%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.97%

10.47%

+1.50%

GKAT vs. KAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GKAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GKAT vs. KAT - Dividend Comparison

GKAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while KAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
GKAT
Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
0.44%0.24%
KAT
Scharf ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GKAT and KAT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GKAT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GKAT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KAT.

GKAT has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for KAT.

GKAT is categorized as Global Equities, while KAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GKAT and 0.75% for KAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GKAT and KAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer