GKAT vs. IMFL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GKAT (Scharf Global Opportunity ETF) and IMFL (Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both Global Equities funds. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GKAT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for IMFL.

Performance

GKAT vs. IMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GKAT achieves a 6.44% return, which is significantly lower than IMFL's 17.83% return.

GKAT

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 6.44%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IMFL

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 17.83%
• 6M: 18.47%
• 1Y: 34.23%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GKAT vs. IMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF	6.44%	5.93%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	17.83%	7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GKAT and IMFL is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

GKAT vs. IMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GKAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IMFL

IMFL Risk / Return Rank: 62
IMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
IMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GKAT vs. IMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scharf Global Opportunity ETF (GKAT) and Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF (IMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GKAT	IMFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.92	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.24	—

Drawdowns

GKAT vs. IMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GKAT drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum IMFL drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GKAT and IMFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GKAT	IMFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.41%	-33.26%	+22.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.77%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-0.53%	-3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.10%	-7.19%	+5.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GKAT	IMFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.04%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.48%	16.52%	-4.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.48%	16.19%	-3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.48%	16.09%	-3.61%

GKAT vs. IMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GKAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IMFL's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

GKAT vs. IMFL - Dividend Comparison

GKAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than IMFL's 3.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GKAT Scharf Global Opportunity ETF	0.46%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMFL Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF	3.48%	2.88%	3.56%	3.85%	3.35%	3.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GKAT and IMFL in my portfolio?

GKAT and IMFL have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GKAT or IMFL?

On fees, IMFL is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GKAT or IMFL?

IMFL is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GKAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GKAT or IMFL?

IMFL has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 0.46% for GKAT.

What is the main difference between GKAT and IMFL?

They also come from different issuers: Scharf Investments and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GKAT and 0.34% for IMFL.