BDGS vs. GMOD
BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) and GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BDGS charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GMOD.
Performance
BDGS vs. GMOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDGS achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly lower than GMOD's 8.06% return.
BDGS
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 4.35%
- 1Y
- 10.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.11%
GMOD
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.83K | $93.96K | $183.58K | |
| $231.46K | $321.90K | $299.47K |
BDGS vs. GMOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 4.35% | 1.27% |
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 8.06% | 4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDGS and GMOD is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDGS vs. GMOD — Risk / Return Rank
BDGS
GMOD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDGS vs. GMOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDGS | GMOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDGS vs. GMOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDGS drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, which is greater than GMOD's maximum drawdown of -6.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDGS and GMOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDGS | GMOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.12% | -6.50% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -0.04% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -1.07% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | — | — |
Volatility
BDGS vs. GMOD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDGS | GMOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.06% | 8.77% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.30% | 8.77% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.30% | 8.77% | -0.47% |
BDGS vs. GMOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDGS has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDGS vs. GMOD - Dividend Comparison
BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than GMOD's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.53% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF | 1.36% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDGS and GMOD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.
GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.
They also come from different issuers: Bridges and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for BDGS and 0.50% for GMOD.
Find the right allocation for BDGS and GMOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer