BDBT vs. TINS

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BDBT (Bluemonte Core Bond ETF) and TINS (Templeton International Insights ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDBT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Bluemonte, while TINS is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton Investments. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDBT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TINS.

Performance

BDBT vs. TINS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDBT achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than TINS's 12.77% return.

BDBT

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -0.47%
• 6M: -0.38%
• YTD: -0.10%
• 1Y: 3.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TINS

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -0.73%
• 6M: 8.71%
• YTD: 12.77%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDBT vs. TINS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	-0.10%	-0.30%
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF	12.77%	3.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BDBT and TINS is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

BDBT vs. TINS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDBT

BDBT Risk / Return Rank: 30
BDBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
BDBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BDBT Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BDBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BDBT Martin Ratio Rank: 30

TINS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDBT vs. TINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT) and Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BDBT	TINS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.44	—	—

Drawdowns

BDBT vs. TINS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDBT drawdown since its inception was -2.88%, smaller than the maximum TINS drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDBT and TINS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDBT	TINS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.88%	-10.79%	+7.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.90%	-2.37%	+0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.78%	-2.17%	+1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDBT	TINS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.98%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.86%	17.57%	-13.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.87%	17.57%	-13.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.87%	17.57%	-13.70%

BDBT vs. TINS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDBT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than TINS's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDBT vs. TINS - Dividend Comparison

BDBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than TINS's 0.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BDBT Bluemonte Core Bond ETF	3.88%	2.21%
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF	0.21%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDBT and TINS in my portfolio?

BDBT and TINS have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BDBT or TINS?

On fees, BDBT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDBT or TINS?

BDBT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TINS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDBT or TINS?

BDBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 0.21% for TINS.

What is the main difference between BDBT and TINS?

BDBT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while TINS is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Franklin Templeton Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BDBT and 0.55% for TINS.