BCTK vs. DRLL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BCTK (Baron Technology ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCTK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Baron Capital, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. BCTK is actively managed, while DRLL is passively managed. Their -0.28 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BCTK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.

Performance

BCTK vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCTK achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 36.69% return.

BCTK

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: -7.64%
• 6M: 13.55%
• YTD: 12.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

DRLL

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 14.19%
• 6M: 21.14%
• YTD: 36.69%
• 1Y: 44.82%
• 3Y*: 12.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	$575.68K	$431.57K	$642.86K
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	$463.62K	$500.96K	$563.89K

BCTK vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	12.33%	0.84%
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	36.69%	-1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BCTK and DRLL is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025	-0.28

Return for Risk

BCTK vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCTK

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRLL

DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 70
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 72
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCTK vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCTK	DRLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.82	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.46	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.27	—

Drawdowns

BCTK vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCTK drawdown since its inception was -18.63%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCTK and DRLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCTK	DRLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.63%	-23.73%	+5.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.99%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.13%	-4.30%	-8.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-8.14%	+4.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCTK	DRLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.80%	23.03%	+8.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.80%	23.80%	+8.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.80%	23.80%	+8.00%

BCTK vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCTK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCTK vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

BCTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCTK Baron Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	2.22%	2.99%	3.00%	3.01%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCTK and DRLL in my portfolio?

BCTK and DRLL have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCTK or DRLL?

On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCTK or DRLL?

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCTK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCTK or DRLL?

DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.00% for BCTK.

What is the main difference between BCTK and DRLL?

BCTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCTK and 0.41% for DRLL.