BCS vs. IHG
BCS (Barclays PLC) and IHG (InterContinental Hotels Group PLC) are both stocks. BCS operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while IHG operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, BCS returned 13.16%/yr vs 17.77%/yr for IHG. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BCS vs. IHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCS achieves a -3.65% return, which is significantly lower than IHG's 17.02% return. Over the past 10 years, BCS has underperformed IHG with an annualized return of 13.16%, while IHG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.77% annualized return.
BCS
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- -3.65%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 35.75%
- 3Y*
- 50.36%
- 5Y*
- 22.92%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
IHG
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 9.18%
- YTD
- 17.02%
- 6M
- 23.63%
- 1Y
- 42.02%
- 3Y*
- 35.03%
- 5Y*
- 19.34%
- 10Y*
- 17.77%
BCS vs. IHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCS Barclays PLC | -3.65% | 96.49% | 76.26% | 6.01% | -21.90% | 31.71% | -12.84% | 31.90% | -29.25% | 0.44% |
IHG InterContinental Hotels Group PLC | 17.02% | 14.53% | 39.13% | 59.59% | -8.70% | 0.14% | -5.17% | 27.65% | -12.53% | 50.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCS and IHG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2003 | 0.50 |
The correlation between BCS and IHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BCS:
$83.15B
IHG:
$25.12B
BCS:
$2.06
IHG:
$8.92
BCS:
11.77
IHG:
18.31
BCS:
2.13
IHG:
0.43
BCS:
2.96
IHG:
2.51
BCS:
$28.57B
IHG:
$10.13B
BCS:
$26.96B
IHG:
$4.63B
BCS:
$9.15B
IHG:
$2.53B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCS vs. IHG — Risk / Return Rank
BCS
IHG
BCS vs. IHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays PLC (BCS) and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCS | IHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.27 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 3.24 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.91 | 9.66 | -5.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCS | IHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.64 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.73 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.58 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.65 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
BCS vs. IHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCS drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than IHG's maximum drawdown of -77.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCS and IHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCS | IHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.36% | -77.84% | -16.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.20% | -13.04% | -13.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.20% | -28.92% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.14% | -33.93% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.10% | -59.29% | -6.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.35% | 0.00% | -28.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.43% | -13.86% | -24.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.17% | 4.36% | +4.81% |
Volatility
BCS vs. IHG - Volatility Comparison
Barclays PLC (BCS) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) at 6.41%. This indicates that BCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCS | IHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.51% | 6.41% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.47% | 18.96% | +4.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.98% | 25.84% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.00% | 26.78% | +7.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.74% | 30.52% | +7.22% |
Dividends
BCS vs. IHG - Dividend Comparison
BCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than IHG's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCS Barclays PLC | 1.93% | 1.70% | 3.13% | 4.86% | 4.18% | 1.61% | 3.91% | 3.68% | 3.21% | 1.37% | 2.26% | 2.95% |
IHG InterContinental Hotels Group PLC | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 1.57% | 2.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.52% | 1.97% | 8.04% | 30.47% | 2.72% |
Financials
BCS vs. IHG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barclays PLC and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BCS vs. IHG - Profitability Comparison
BCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a gross profit of 8.16B and revenue of 8.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
IHG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported a gross profit of 979.00M and revenue of 2.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.7%.
BCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported an operating income of 2.81B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.5%.
IHG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported an operating income of 575.00M and revenue of 2.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.
BCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barclays PLC reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 8.16B, resulting in a net margin of 26.7%.
IHG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported a net income of 289.00M and revenue of 2.67B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BCS and IHG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCS has higher volatility (9.51%) compared to IHG (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCS dropped -94.36% vs IHG's -77.84%.
IHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCS and IHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer