PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IHG vs. IHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IHG vs. IHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) and InnSuites Hospitality Trust (IHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHG achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly lower than IHT's 28.77% return. Over the past 10 years, IHG has outperformed IHT with an annualized return of 16.45%, while IHT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.81% annualized return.


IHG

1D
-0.19%
1M
-4.50%
6M
19.29%
YTD
16.25%
1Y
43.48%
3Y*
31.08%
5Y*
21.65%
10Y*
16.45%
ALL TIME*
21.08%

IHT

1D
1.18%
1M
2.40%
6M
44.92%
YTD
28.77%
1Y
-11.06%
3Y*
-2.96%
5Y*
-19.06%
10Y*
-1.81%
ALL TIME*
-4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.79M$42.62M$39.72M
$32.76K$46.05K$800.61K

IHG vs. IHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
16.25%14.53%39.13%59.59%-8.70%0.14%-5.17%27.65%-12.53%50.75%
IHT
InnSuites Hospitality Trust
28.77%-37.47%29.60%2.33%-22.86%-0.34%46.16%-1.33%-9.04%-20.96%

Correlation

The correlation between IHG and IHT is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2003

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IHG:

$23.98B

IHT:

$16.08M

EPS

IHG:

$9.04

IHT:

-$0.16

PS Ratio

IHG:

2.46

IHT:

2.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

IHG:

$10.13B

IHT:

$7.44M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IHG:

$4.63B

IHT:

$2.44M

EBITDA (TTM)

IHG:

$2.53B

IHT:

$25.95K

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IHG vs. IHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IHG
IHG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IHT
IHT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IHG vs. IHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) and InnSuites Hospitality Trust (IHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IHGIHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.09

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

-0.10

+3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

-0.13

+8.94

IHG vs. IHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the IHT Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHG and IHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IHG vs. IHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHG drawdown since its inception was -77.84%, smaller than the maximum IHT drawdown of -96.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHG and IHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IHGIHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.84%

-96.89%

+19.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.04%

-69.61%

+56.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.92%

-69.61%

+40.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-80.11%

+46.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.29%

-91.17%

+31.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

-88.72%

+81.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.80%

-75.80%

+62.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

54.94%

-50.20%

Volatility

IHG vs. IHT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) is 5.61%, while InnSuites Hospitality Trust (IHT) has a volatility of 17.24%. This indicates that IHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IHGIHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

17.24%

-11.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.74%

39.44%

-20.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.58%

93.76%

-68.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.63%

86.99%

-60.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.25%

94.74%

-64.49%

Dividends

IHG vs. IHT - Dividend Comparison

IHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than IHT's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
1.14%1.23%1.26%1.57%2.22%0.00%0.00%5.52%1.97%8.04%30.47%2.72%
IHT
InnSuites Hospitality Trust
0.58%1.49%0.93%1.18%1.20%0.92%0.91%1.31%1.27%1.71%0.44%0.48%

Financials

IHG vs. IHT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between InterContinental Hotels Group PLC and InnSuites Hospitality Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IHG and IHT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHT has higher volatility (17.24%) compared to IHG (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHG dropped -77.84% vs IHT's -96.89%.

IHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IHG and IHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer