IHG vs. SWAN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IHG (InterContinental Hotels Group PLC) is a stock, while SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) is Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index. Over the past 5 years, IHG returned 21.44%/yr vs 2.87%/yr for SWAN. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IHG vs. SWAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IHG achieves a 22.41% return, which is significantly higher than SWAN's 3.29% return.

IHG

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 11.62%
• YTD: 22.41%
• 6M: 20.51%
• 1Y: 53.39%
• 3Y*: 38.24%
• 5Y*: 21.44%
• 10Y*: 18.38%

SWAN

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -0.50%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 14.05%
• 3Y*: 12.19%
• 5Y*: 2.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IHG vs. SWAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IHG InterContinental Hotels Group PLC	22.41%	14.53%	39.13%	59.59%	-8.70%	0.14%	-5.17%	27.65%	0.37%
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	3.29%	13.93%	13.44%	12.07%	-27.77%	10.55%	16.17%	22.03%	-2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IHG and SWAN is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018	0.40

Return for Risk

IHG vs. SWAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IHG

IHG Risk / Return Rank: 89
IHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
IHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IHG Omega Ratio Rank: 85
IHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IHG Martin Ratio Rank: 91

SWAN

SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 43
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IHG vs. SWAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) and Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IHG	SWAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.42	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.02	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.25	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.11	2.00	+2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.48	7.65	+4.83

IHG vs. SWAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the SWAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IHG and SWAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IHG vs. SWAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IHG drawdown since its inception was -77.84%, which is greater than SWAN's maximum drawdown of -31.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IHG and SWAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IHG	SWAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.84%	-31.04%	-46.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.04%	-7.05%	-5.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.92%	-12.07%	-16.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.89%	-31.04%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-2.43%	+2.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.83%	-8.83%	-5.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	1.84%	+2.45%

Volatility

IHG vs. SWAN - Volatility Comparison

InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) at 3.97%. This indicates that IHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IHG	SWAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.37%	3.97%	+1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.83%	7.97%	+10.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.41%	10.00%	+15.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.75%	11.43%	+15.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.34%	12.49%	+17.85%

Dividends

IHG vs. SWAN - Dividend Comparison

IHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than SWAN's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IHG InterContinental Hotels Group PLC	1.08%	1.23%	1.26%	1.57%	2.22%	0.00%	0.00%	5.52%	1.97%	8.04%	30.47%	2.72%
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	2.84%	2.86%	2.54%	2.98%	2.12%	5.04%	1.64%	3.69%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IHG and SWAN in my portfolio?

IHG and SWAN have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IHG or SWAN?

IHG has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to SWAN (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IHG dropped -77.84% vs SWAN's -31.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.