BCPL vs. CFIT
BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) and CFIT (Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCPL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for CFIT.
Performance
BCPL vs. CFIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCPL
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CFIT
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 9.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCPL vs. CFIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 0.06% |
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF | 3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCPL and CFIT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCPL vs. CFIT — Risk / Return Rank
BCPL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CFIT
BCPL vs. CFIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCPL | CFIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.22 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCPL vs. CFIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCPL drawdown since its inception was -2.95%, smaller than the maximum CFIT drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCPL and CFIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCPL | CFIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -4.23% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -1.75% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -1.19% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.19% | — |
Volatility
BCPL vs. CFIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCPL | CFIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.01% | 5.82% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.01% | 5.62% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.01% | 5.62% | -1.61% |
BCPL vs. CFIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCPL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CFIT's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCPL vs. CFIT - Dividend Comparison
BCPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than CFIT's 3.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF | 1.94% | 0.00% |
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF | 3.89% | 3.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCPL and CFIT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCPL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCPL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CFIT.
CFIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 1.94% for BCPL.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BCPL and 0.71% for CFIT.
Find the right allocation for BCPL and CFIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer