PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFIT vs. ZHOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CFIT vs. ZHOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CFIT vs. ZHOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CFIT
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF
-0.25%3.59%
ZHOG
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
-0.08%4.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFIT achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than ZHOG's -0.08% return.


CFIT

1D
0.87%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
-0.25%
6M
0.26%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZHOG

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
1.03%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CFIT vs. ZHOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFIT has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than ZHOG's 0.43% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CFIT vs. ZHOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFIT

ZHOG
ZHOG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ZHOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFIT vs. ZHOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFITZHOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

1.98

-1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.86

2.64

-1.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.44

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.62

CFIT vs. ZHOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFIT Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the ZHOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFIT and ZHOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFITZHOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

1.98

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.60

-0.98

Correlation

The correlation between CFIT and ZHOG is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CFIT vs. ZHOG - Dividend Comparison

CFIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than ZHOG's 5.60% yield.


TTM202520242023
CFIT
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF
4.33%3.14%0.00%0.00%
ZHOG
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
5.60%5.35%5.50%1.70%

Drawdowns

CFIT vs. ZHOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFIT drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, which is greater than ZHOG's maximum drawdown of -3.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIT and ZHOG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CFITZHOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-3.66%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

-2.20%

-2.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-0.83%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-0.73%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

0.54%

+1.21%

Volatility

CFIT vs. ZHOG - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG) at 0.70%. This indicates that CFIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZHOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CFITZHOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

0.70%

+2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.45%

1.09%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.44%

2.31%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.44%

4.13%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.44%

4.13%

+1.31%