CFIT vs. ESGB
CFIT (Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF) and ESGB (IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CFIT charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ESGB.
Performance
CFIT vs. ESGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CFIT
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 1Y
- 9.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGB
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CFIT vs. ESGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF | -1.48% |
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CFIT and ESGB is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CFIT vs. ESGB — Risk / Return Rank
CFIT
ESGB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CFIT vs. ESGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) and IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CFIT | ESGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CFIT vs. ESGB - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFIT | ESGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | — | — |
Volatility
CFIT vs. ESGB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CFIT | ESGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.91% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.83% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.63% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.63% | — | — |
CFIT vs. ESGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFIT has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
CFIT vs. ESGB - Dividend Comparison
CFIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, while ESGB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF | 3.90% | 3.14% |
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CFIT and ESGB have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CFIT.
CFIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.00% for ESGB.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and IndexIQ. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for CFIT and 0.39% for ESGB.
Find the right allocation for CFIT and ESGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer