BCI vs. SCHH
BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) and SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while SCHH is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCI returned 9.82%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for SCHH. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCI charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SCHH.
Performance
BCI vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCI achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than SCHH's 13.92% return.
BCI
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 16.52%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHH
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 13.92%
- 6M
- 14.36%
- 1Y
- 14.58%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 4.16%
BCI vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 16.69% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -8.79% | 15.09% | 26.18% | -2.77% | 7.06% | -11.21% | 3.81% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 13.92% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCI and SCHH is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2017 | 0.14 |
The correlation between BCI and SCHH shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCI vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank
BCI
SCHH
BCI vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCI | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.77 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | 5.53 | +1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCI vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCI drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum SCHH drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCI and SCHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCI | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.69% | -44.22% | +11.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.04% | -8.28% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.04% | -17.76% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.50% | -33.28% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.04% | -2.07% | -9.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.98% | -9.43% | -2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 2.64% | +0.92% |
Volatility
BCI vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) is 3.49%, while Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that BCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCI | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 5.21% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.94% | 10.38% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 13.86% | +3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 18.76% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 21.02% | -5.37% |
BCI vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BCI vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison
BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.13%, more than SCHH's 2.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.13% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.75% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCI and SCHH have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHH has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to BCI (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCI dropped -32.69% vs SCHH's -44.22%.
On 5-year performance, BCI leads with 9.82% vs 3.36% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BCI has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BCI has performed better with a 9.82% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for BCI.
BCI has the higher dividend yield at 14.13%, compared with 2.75% for SCHH.
BCI is categorized as Commodities, while SCHH is REIT. BCI tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for BCI and 0.07% for SCHH.
BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCI and SCHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer