PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCGS vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCGS vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BCGS

1D
-1.03%
1M
-2.24%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POW

1D
-3.68%
1M
-13.79%
6M
25.01%
YTD
35.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGS vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCGS and POW is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCGS vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCGS vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCGS vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCGSPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-20.28%

+12.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-20.28%

+16.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-4.56%

+2.35%

Volatility

BCGS vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCGSPOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.04%

33.06%

-11.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.04%

33.06%

-11.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.04%

33.06%

-11.02%

BCGS vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCGS vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BCGS and POW have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCGS.

BCGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

BCGS is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 0.75% for POW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCGS and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer