BCGS vs. NXTE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCGS charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for NXTE.

Performance

BCGS vs. NXTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCGS

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 2.63%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NXTE

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 17.52%
• YTD: 36.11%
• 6M: 34.91%
• 1Y: 64.20%
• 3Y*: 18.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGS vs. NXTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	6.44%
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	29.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BCGS and NXTE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026	0.85

Return for Risk

BCGS vs. NXTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTE

NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 79
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 71
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCGS vs. NXTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCGS	NXTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	0.67	+0.72

Drawdowns

BCGS vs. NXTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum NXTE drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and NXTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCGS	NXTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-28.64%	+21.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-0.62%	-1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-7.88%	+5.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCGS	NXTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.77%	24.53%	-2.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.77%	25.99%	-4.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.77%	25.99%	-4.22%

BCGS vs. NXTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTE's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCGS vs. NXTE - Dividend Comparison

BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than NXTE's 0.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.52%	0.76%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCGS and NXTE in my portfolio?

BCGS and NXTE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCGS or NXTE?

On fees, BCGS is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCGS or NXTE?

BCGS is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCGS or NXTE?

NXTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.

What is the main difference between BCGS and NXTE?

They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 1.00% for NXTE.