BCGS vs. HERD
BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) are both Global Equities funds. BCGS is actively managed, while HERD is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCGS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for HERD.
Performance
BCGS vs. HERD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCGS
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HERD
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
BCGS vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 6.44% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 5.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGS and HERD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCGS vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank
BCGS
HERD
BCGS vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCGS | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.63 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
BCGS vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum HERD drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and HERD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGS | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -39.41% | +31.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -0.67% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -4.55% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.66% | — |
Volatility
BCGS vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCGS | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.77% | 11.62% | +10.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 17.76% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 20.50% | +1.27% |
BCGS vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCGS vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison
BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than HERD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 3.13% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCGS and HERD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HERD is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HERD is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCGS.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.
They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 0.73% for HERD.
Find the right allocation for BCGS and HERD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer