BCGS vs. CLUB
BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and CLUB (Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF) are both Global Equities funds from Bancreek. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCGS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CLUB.
Performance
BCGS vs. CLUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCGS
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLUB
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCGS vs. CLUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 0.96% |
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | -1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGS and CLUB is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCGS vs. CLUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF (CLUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCGS vs. CLUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum CLUB drawdown of -9.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and CLUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGS | CLUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -9.33% | +1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -7.61% | +4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -4.50% | +2.29% |
Volatility
BCGS vs. CLUB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCGS | CLUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.04% | 20.31% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 20.31% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.04% | 20.31% | +1.73% |
BCGS vs. CLUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CLUB's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCGS vs. CLUB - Dividend Comparison
BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than CLUB's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 0.44% |
CLUB Bancreek Billionaires Club ETF | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCGS and CLUB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLUB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLUB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCGS.
BCGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.08% for CLUB.
Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 0.75% for CLUB.
Find the right allocation for BCGS and CLUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer