PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCGS vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCGS vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BCGS

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.67%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDVL

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
4.60%
6M
3.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGS vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BCGS and BDVL is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCGS vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCGS vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCGS vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, roughly equal to the maximum BDVL drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCGSBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-7.71%

+0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-1.53%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-1.18%

-0.94%

Volatility

BCGS vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCGSBDVLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.51%

9.69%

+12.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

9.69%

+12.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.51%

9.69%

+12.82%

BCGS vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCGS vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BDVL's 3.56% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BCGS and BDVL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCGS.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.

They also come from different issuers: Bancreek and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCGS and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer