BCFN vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

BCFN (Baron Financials ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFN is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. BCFN is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. BCFN charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

BCFN vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCFN achieves a -9.94% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.

BCFN

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 6.19%
• 6M: -11.14%
• YTD: -9.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 39.32%
• 6M: -19.19%
• YTD: -26.97%
• 1Y: 264.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCFN vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCFN Baron Financials ETF	-9.94%	-0.45%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-26.97%	29.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BCFN and MSTZ is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025	-0.36

Return for Risk

BCFN vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCFN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCFN vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCFN	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.64	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.86	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.59	—

Drawdowns

BCFN vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCFN drawdown since its inception was -20.95%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFN and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCFN	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.95%	-99.38%	+78.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-84.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.18%	-97.51%	+85.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.76%	-94.53%	+81.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	43.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCFN	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	56.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	135.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.27%	148.41%	-129.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.27%	171.17%	-151.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.27%	171.17%	-151.90%

BCFN vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCFN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCFN vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither BCFN nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCFN and MSTZ in my portfolio?

BCFN and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCFN or MSTZ?

On fees, BCFN is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCFN or MSTZ?

BCFN is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCFN or MSTZ?

BCFN and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BCFN and MSTZ?

BCFN is categorized as Financials Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Baron Capital and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCFN and 1.05% for MSTZ.