BCD vs. VOO
BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCD is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. BCD is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BCD returned 11.98%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for VOO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
BCD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCD achieves a 20.45% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.
BCD
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 20.45%
- 6M
- 20.51%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.98%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
BCD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 20.45% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 4.76% | 7.34% | -8.65% | 3.08% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 15.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCD and VOO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2017 | 0.24 |
The correlation between BCD and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
BCD
VOO
BCD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 3.16 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.57 | 14.73 | -2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.39 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.83 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.89 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
BCD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCD drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCD and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.81% | -33.99% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -8.90% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.50% | -18.69% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.03% | -24.52% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.60% | -0.70% | -2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -3.69% | -6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 1.91% | +0.63% |
Volatility
BCD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that BCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 2.84% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 8.90% | +2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.72% | 11.80% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.41% | 16.81% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 18.01% | -4.11% |
BCD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
BCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.29%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.29% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCD and VOO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCD has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCD dropped -29.81% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 11.98% for BCD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BCD.
BCD has the higher dividend yield at 14.29%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
BCD is categorized as Commodities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Aberdeen and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for BCD and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BCD and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer