BCCC vs. EZET

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BCCC is actively managed, while EZET is passively managed. Over the past year, BCCC returned -28.98% vs -32.57% for EZET. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCCC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.

Performance

BCCC vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCCC achieves a -23.52% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -40.23% return.

BCCC

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: -18.36%
• YTD: -23.52%
• 6M: -24.11%
• 1Y: -28.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZET

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -25.14%
• YTD: -40.23%
• 6M: -43.56%
• 1Y: -32.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCCC vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	-23.52%	-7.14%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-40.23%	12.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BCCC and EZET is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.85

Return for Risk

BCCC vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 5
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCCC vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BCCC	EZET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.83	-0.42	-0.41

Drawdowns

BCCC vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCCC drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -64.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCC and EZET.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCCC	EZET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.62%	-64.05%	+22.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.62%	-63.36%	+21.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.88%	-63.36%	+24.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.93%	-32.74%	+15.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	37.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCCC	EZET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.09%	68.34%	-33.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.09%	72.29%	-37.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.09%	72.29%	-37.20%

BCCC vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCCC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCCC vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.17%, while EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF	64.17%	29.55%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCCC and EZET in my portfolio?

BCCC and EZET have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BCCC or EZET?

On 1-year performance, BCCC leads with -28.98% vs -32.57% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCCC or EZET?

Over the 1-year period, BCCC has performed better with a -28.98% return vs -32.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCCC or EZET?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCCC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCCC or EZET?

BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 64.17%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between BCCC and EZET?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCCC and 0.19% for EZET.