BCCC vs. BOTZ
BCCC (Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCCC is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Global X, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. BCCC is actively managed, while BOTZ is passively managed. Over the past year, BCCC returned -28.98% vs 28.51% for BOTZ. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BCCC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
BCCC vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCCC achieves a -23.52% return, which is significantly lower than BOTZ's 10.63% return.
BCCC
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- -18.36%
- YTD
- -23.52%
- 6M
- -24.11%
- 1Y
- -28.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 3.08%
- 10Y*
- —
BCCC vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -23.52% | -7.14% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 10.63% | 16.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCCC and BOTZ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCCC vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
BCCC
BOTZ
BCCC vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCC) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCCC | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.83 | 0.44 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
BCCC vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCCC drawdown since its inception was -41.62%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCC and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCCC | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.62% | -55.54% | +13.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.62% | -19.34% | -22.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.88% | -3.72% | -35.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.93% | -18.32% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.63% | — |
Volatility
BCCC vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCCC | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.09% | 23.97% | +11.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.09% | 26.72% | +8.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.09% | 25.72% | +9.37% |
BCCC vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCCC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCCC vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
BCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.17%, more than BOTZ's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCCC Global X Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 64.17% | 29.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.59% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCCC and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, BOTZ leads with 28.51% vs -28.98% for BCCC. On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BOTZ has performed better with a 28.51% return vs -28.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BCCC.
BCCC has the higher dividend yield at 64.17%, compared with 0.59% for BOTZ.
BCCC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BOTZ is Robotics. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BCCC and 0.68% for BOTZ.
Find the right allocation for BCCC and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer