BBY.L vs. GFI
BBY.L (Balfour Beatty plc) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. BBY.L operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BBY.L returned 16.44%/yr vs 28.11%/yr for GFI. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BBY.L vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BBY.L is traded in GBp, while GFI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GFI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBY.L achieves a 19.40% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -13.53% return. Over the past 10 years, BBY.L has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 16.44%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 28.11% annualized return.
BBY.L
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 19.40%
- 6M
- 19.82%
- 1Y
- 71.74%
- 3Y*
- 35.84%
- 5Y*
- 26.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.44%
GFI
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- -17.27%
- YTD
- -13.53%
- 6M
- -13.84%
- 1Y
- 49.49%
- 3Y*
- 36.38%
- 5Y*
- 33.40%
- 10Y*
- 28.11%
BBY.L vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBY.L Balfour Beatty plc | 19.40% | 60.14% | 41.45% | 1.07% | 33.46% | -1.39% | 5.28% | 7.22% | -14.87% | 11.65% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -13.53% | 216.17% | -4.63% | 37.66% | 8.97% | 24.50% | 38.82% | 82.26% | -11.81% | 32.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBY.L and GFI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.03 |
The correlation between BBY.L and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (10 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BBY.L:
£4.19B
GFI:
$32.65B
BBY.L:
£0.87
GFI:
$5.39
BBY.L:
9.64
GFI:
6.78
BBY.L:
0.25
GFI:
0.11
BBY.L:
0.24
GFI:
2.34
BBY.L:
3.67
GFI:
3.87
BBY.L:
£17.72B
GFI:
$13.98B
BBY.L:
£872.00M
GFI:
$7.34B
BBY.L:
£509.00M
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBY.L vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
BBY.L
GFI
BBY.L vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBY.L | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.19 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | 1.26 | +4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.85 | 3.46 | +20.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBY.L vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBY.L drawdown since its inception was -54.74%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -87.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBY.L and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBY.L | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.74% | -87.49% | +32.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -42.09% | +30.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.04% | -42.09% | +25.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.59% | -47.77% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | -63.13% | +25.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -37.10% | +34.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.42% | -39.90% | +25.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 15.30% | -12.46% |
Volatility
BBY.L vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) is 7.05%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 16.81%. This indicates that BBY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBY.L | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 16.81% | -9.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.48% | 44.31% | -25.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 58.03% | -35.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 50.17% | -26.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.34% | 53.58% | -26.24% |
Dividends
BBY.L vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
BBY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than GFI's 5.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBY.L Balfour Beatty plc | 1.67% | 1.81% | 2.59% | 3.17% | 2.81% | 1.72% | 1.59% | 2.03% | 1.60% | 1.01% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
BBY.L vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Balfour Beatty plc and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BBY.L vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
BBY.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balfour Beatty plc reported a gross profit of 265.00M and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.3%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
BBY.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balfour Beatty plc reported an operating income of 105.00M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
BBY.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balfour Beatty plc reported a net income of 162.00M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBY.L and GFI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BBY.L and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer