BBY.L vs. KLR.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) and Keller Group plc (KLR.L).

Performance

BBY.L vs. KLR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) and Keller Group plc (KLR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BBY.L vs. KLR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBY.L Balfour Beatty plc	9.14%	60.14%	41.45%	1.07%	33.46%	-1.39%	-391.73%	7.22%	-14.87%	11.65%
KLR.L Keller Group plc	19.21%	18.93%	70.44%	16.06%	-14.80%	46.98%	3.13%	60.22%	-47.46%	19.14%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BBY.L : £3.88B KLR.L : £1.42B
EPS BBY.L : £0.87 KLR.L : £3.97
PE Ratio BBY.L : 8.92 KLR.L : 5.01
PEG Ratio BBY.L : 0.24 KLR.L : 0.14
PS Ratio BBY.L : 0.22 KLR.L : 0.23
PB Ratio BBY.L : 3.39 KLR.L : 2.21
Total Revenue (TTM) BBY.L : £17.72B KLR.L : £6.07B
Gross Profit (TTM) BBY.L : £872.00M KLR.L : £1.70B
EBITDA (TTM) BBY.L : £509.00M KLR.L : £618.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBY.L achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than KLR.L's 19.21% return.

BBY.L

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 2.65%
• YTD: 9.14%
• 6M: 21.25%
• 1Y: 82.23%
• 3Y*: 31.33%
• 5Y*: 24.37%
• 10Y*: —

KLR.L

• 1D: 3.33%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 19.21%
• 6M: 32.22%
• 1Y: 46.42%
• 3Y*: 48.94%
• 5Y*: 24.73%
• 10Y*: 13.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BBY.L vs. KLR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBY.L

BBY.L Risk / Return Rank: 98
BBY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BBY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BBY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BBY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BBY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

KLR.L

KLR.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
KLR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
KLR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
KLR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 83
KLR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
KLR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBY.L vs. KLR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) and Keller Group plc (KLR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBY.L	KLR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.63	1.73	+1.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.47	2.45	+2.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.32	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.84	2.38	+4.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	35.60	5.51	+30.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBY.L vs. KLR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBY.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is higher than the KLR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBY.L and KLR.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBY.L	KLR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.63	1.73	+1.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.06	0.78	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.39	—

Correlation

The correlation between BBY.L and KLR.L is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BBY.L vs. KLR.L - Dividend Comparison

BBY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than KLR.L's 2.59% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBY.L Balfour Beatty plc	1.66%	1.81%	2.59%	3.17%	2.81%	1.72%	118.59%	2.03%	1.60%	1.01%	1.08%	0.00%
KLR.L Keller Group plc	2.59%	3.09%	3.30%	4.36%	4.56%	3.64%	9.07%	4.87%	7.40%	2.98%	3.26%	3.07%

Drawdowns

BBY.L vs. KLR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBY.L drawdown since its inception was -934.27%, which is greater than KLR.L's maximum drawdown of -76.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBY.L and KLR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBY.L	KLR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-934.27%	-76.76%	-857.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-18.48%	+6.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.08%	-39.69%	+7.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-934.27%	-57.83%	-876.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-928.93%	-10.34%	-918.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-100.68%	-23.70%	-76.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	7.97%	-5.68%

Volatility

BBY.L vs. KLR.L - Volatility Comparison

Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) has a higher volatility of 11.83% compared to Keller Group plc (KLR.L) at 9.08%. This indicates that BBY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBY.L	KLR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.83%	9.08%	+2.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.31%	18.50%	-2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.56%	26.83%	-4.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.05%	31.72%	-8.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	125.97%	37.14%	+88.83%

Financials

BBY.L vs. KLR.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Balfour Beatty plc and Keller Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BBY.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Balfour Beatty plc reported a gross profit of 265.00M and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.3%.

KLR.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Keller Group plc reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.1%.

BBY.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Balfour Beatty plc reported an operating income of 105.00M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

KLR.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Keller Group plc reported an operating income of 1.57B and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 96.5%.

BBY.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Balfour Beatty plc reported a net income of 162.00M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

KLR.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Keller Group plc reported a net income of 76.30M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.