PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBY.L vs. MAP.MC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BBY.L vs. MAP.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) and Mapfre (MAP.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBY.L is traded in GBp, while MAP.MC is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MAP.MC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBY.L achieves a 15.35% return, which is significantly higher than MAP.MC's -8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, BBY.L has outperformed MAP.MC with an annualized return of 15.41%, while MAP.MC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.66% annualized return.


BBY.L

1D
1.25%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
15.35%
6M
13.67%
1Y
64.06%
3Y*
33.04%
5Y*
25.08%
10Y*
15.41%

MAP.MC

1D
-0.19%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
-8.10%
6M
-1.95%
1Y
23.65%
3Y*
33.49%
5Y*
22.21%
10Y*
12.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBY.L vs. MAP.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBY.L
Balfour Beatty plc
15.35%60.14%41.45%1.07%33.46%-1.39%3.37%7.22%-14.87%11.65%
MAP.MC
Mapfre
-8.10%91.48%26.64%11.75%12.81%12.69%-23.95%0.48%-8.28%0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BBY.L and MAP.MC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBY.L vs. MAP.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBY.L
BBY.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BBY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BBY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MAP.MC
MAP.MC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MAP.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBY.L vs. MAP.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) and Mapfre (MAP.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBY.LMAP.MCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.21

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.35

1.39

+3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.41

3.70

+19.72

BBY.L vs. MAP.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the MAP.MC Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBY.L and MAP.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBY.LMAP.MCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

1.10

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

1.02

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.50

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.21

-0.05

Drawdowns

BBY.L vs. MAP.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBY.L drawdown since its inception was -89.40%, which is greater than MAP.MC's maximum drawdown of -59.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBY.L and MAP.MC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBY.LMAP.MCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.40%

-59.61%

-29.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-16.80%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.24%

-16.80%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.59%

-20.34%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-53.14%

+15.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

-9.21%

+3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.04%

-19.91%

-6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

6.35%

-3.62%

Volatility

BBY.L vs. MAP.MC - Volatility Comparison

Balfour Beatty plc (BBY.L) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Mapfre (MAP.MC) at 4.85%. This indicates that BBY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAP.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBY.LMAP.MCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

4.85%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.26%

17.34%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

21.19%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.29%

21.44%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.27%

25.03%

+2.24%

Dividends

BBY.L vs. MAP.MC - Dividend Comparison

BBY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than MAP.MC's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBY.L
Balfour Beatty plc
1.73%1.81%2.59%3.17%2.81%1.72%0.00%2.03%1.60%1.01%1.08%0.00%
MAP.MC
Mapfre
3.77%3.19%5.16%6.08%6.54%6.12%6.93%5.02%5.10%4.40%3.65%4.86%

Financials

BBY.L vs. MAP.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Balfour Beatty plc and Mapfre. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. BBY.L values in GBp, MAP.MC values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


BBY.L and MAP.MC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBY.L and MAP.MC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer