BBW vs. LMB
BBW (Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.) and LMB (Limbach Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. BBW operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while LMB operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, BBW returned 12.01%/yr vs 22.83%/yr for LMB. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BBW vs. LMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBW achieves a -43.92% return, which is significantly lower than LMB's -7.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BBW has underperformed LMB with an annualized return of 12.01%, while LMB has yielded a comparatively higher 22.83% annualized return.
BBW
- 1D
- -3.83%
- 1M
- 7.68%
- 6M
- -42.43%
- YTD
- -43.92%
- 1Y
- -29.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.90%
LMB
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -16.61%
- YTD
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- -46.28%
- 3Y*
- 37.90%
- 5Y*
- 51.72%
- 10Y*
- 22.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.11M | $10.86M | $12.86M | |
| $12.69M | $13.00M | $22.33M |
BBW vs. LMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBW Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. | -43.92% | 35.39% | 105.62% | 2.79% | 22.13% | 385.45% | 31.79% | -17.97% | -57.07% | -33.09% |
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | -7.90% | -8.99% | 88.12% | 336.79% | 15.67% | -27.01% | 226.19% | 2.72% | -73.39% | -1.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBW and LMB is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2016 | 0.14 |
The correlation between BBW and LMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BBW:
$425.27M
LMB:
$854.74M
BBW:
$4.25
LMB:
$2.75
BBW:
7.98
LMB:
26.10
BBW:
1.14
LMB:
0.36
BBW:
0.84
LMB:
1.33
BBW:
2.70
LMB:
4.41
BBW:
$526.71M
LMB:
$652.56M
BBW:
$302.52M
LMB:
$163.77M
BBW:
$82.42M
LMB:
$58.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBW vs. LMB — Risk / Return Rank
BBW
LMB
BBW vs. LMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBW | LMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.89 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | -0.94 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | -1.29 | +0.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBW vs. LMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBW drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, which is greater than LMB's maximum drawdown of -84.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBW and LMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBW | LMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.24% | -84.10% | -13.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.86% | -51.11% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.86% | -55.92% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.86% | -55.92% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.40% | -84.10% | -9.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.37% | -52.05% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.67% | -31.84% | -27.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.53% | 37.78% | -0.25% |
Volatility
BBW vs. LMB - Volatility Comparison
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) and Limbach Holdings, Inc. (LMB) have volatilities of 14.50% and 13.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBW | LMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.50% | 13.96% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.09% | 56.28% | -24.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.89% | 65.37% | -13.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.31% | 62.93% | -7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.99% | 62.78% | +3.21% |
Dividends
BBW vs. LMB - Dividend Comparison
BBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while LMB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBW Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. | 2.65% | 1.44% | 1.74% | 6.52% | 0.00% | 6.40% |
LMB Limbach Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BBW vs. LMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. and Limbach Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BBW vs. LMB - Profitability Comparison
BBW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.87M and revenue of 125.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.
LMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.17M and revenue of 138.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.5%.
BBW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.75M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
LMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
BBW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a net income of 18.30M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
LMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Limbach Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 4.38M and revenue of 138.86M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBW and LMB have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBW has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to LMB (13.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBW dropped -97.24% vs LMB's -84.10%.
BBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBW and LMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer