PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BBW vs. KO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BBWKO
YTD Return67.75%13.00%
1Y Return49.14%18.30%
3Y Return (Ann)39.78%7.88%
5Y Return (Ann)65.82%7.59%
10Y Return (Ann)9.42%7.79%
Sharpe Ratio1.281.45
Sortino Ratio2.032.11
Omega Ratio1.261.26
Calmar Ratio1.571.67
Martin Ratio4.327.35
Ulcer Index12.27%2.39%
Daily Std Dev41.35%12.15%
Max Drawdown-97.24%-40.60%
Current Drawdown-3.18%-10.21%

Fundamentals


BBWKO
Market Cap$514.62M$280.48B
EPS$3.51$2.42
PE Ratio10.7626.91
PEG Ratio0.552.74
Total Revenue (TTM)$375.81M$46.37B
Gross Profit (TTM)$206.95M$28.02B
EBITDA (TTM)$63.12M$11.65B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between BBW and KO is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

BBW vs. KO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BBW achieves a 67.75% return, which is significantly higher than KO's 13.00% return. Over the past 10 years, BBW has outperformed KO with an annualized return of 9.42%, while KO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
34.50%
5.50%
BBW
KO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BBW vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BBW, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BBW, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BBW, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BBW, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.57
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BBW, currently valued at 4.32, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.004.32
KO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for KO, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for KO, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for KO, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for KO, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.67
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for KO, currently valued at 7.35, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.007.35

BBW vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBW Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the KO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBW and KO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.28
1.45
BBW
KO

Dividends

BBW vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

BBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than KO's 2.94% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BBW
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
1.59%6.52%0.00%6.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.94%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%2.89%2.71%

Drawdowns

BBW vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBW drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBW and KO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.18%
-10.21%
BBW
KO

Volatility

BBW vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) has a higher volatility of 10.24% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 4.09%. This indicates that BBW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.24%
4.09%
BBW
KO

Financials

BBW vs. KO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items