BBW vs. KO
BBW (Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.) and KO (The Coca-Cola Company) are both stocks. BBW operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while KO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, BBW returned 11.21%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for KO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BBW vs. KO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBW achieves a -44.42% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 22.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BBW has outperformed KO with an annualized return of 11.21%, while KO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.
BBW
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- 6M
- -50.45%
- YTD
- -44.42%
- 1Y
- -31.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
KO
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 21.10%
- YTD
- 22.12%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
BBW vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBW Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. | -44.42% | 35.39% | 105.62% | 2.79% | 22.13% | 385.45% | 31.79% | -17.97% | -57.07% | -33.09% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 22.12% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBW and KO is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2004 | 0.16 |
The correlation between BBW and KO shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BBW:
$421.51M
KO:
$362.48B
BBW:
$4.25
KO:
$3.18
BBW:
7.91
KO:
26.53
BBW:
1.13
KO:
3.20
BBW:
0.83
KO:
7.37
BBW:
2.67
KO:
10.81
BBW:
$526.71M
KO:
$49.28B
BBW:
$302.52M
KO:
$30.43B
BBW:
$82.42M
KO:
$18.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBW vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank
BBW
KO
BBW vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBW | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.25 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 3.06 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 6.70 | -7.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBW vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBW drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBW and KO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBW | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.24% | -68.23% | -29.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.86% | -7.87% | -51.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.86% | -16.26% | -43.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.86% | -17.27% | -42.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.40% | -36.99% | -56.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.77% | 0.00% | -54.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.68% | -16.07% | -43.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.36% | 3.59% | +31.77% |
Volatility
BBW vs. KO - Volatility Comparison
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) has a higher volatility of 16.27% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 6.08%. This indicates that BBW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBW | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.27% | 6.08% | +10.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.81% | 13.32% | +19.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.20% | 17.32% | +34.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.43% | 16.32% | +39.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.98% | 18.30% | +47.68% |
Dividends
BBW vs. KO - Dividend Comparison
BBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than KO's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBW Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. | 2.68% | 1.44% | 1.74% | 6.52% | 0.00% | 6.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.47% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
Financials
BBW vs. KO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BBW vs. KO - Profitability Comparison
BBW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.87M and revenue of 125.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.
BBW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.75M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
BBW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a net income of 18.30M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBW and KO have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBW has higher volatility (16.27%) compared to KO (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBW dropped -97.24% vs KO's -68.23%.
KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBW and KO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer