BBW vs. KO
BBW (Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.) and KO (The Coca-Cola Company) are both stocks. BBW operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while KO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, BBW returned 12.01%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for KO. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BBW vs. KO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBW achieves a -43.92% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 26.97% return. Over the past 10 years, BBW has outperformed KO with an annualized return of 12.01%, while KO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.64% annualized return.
BBW
- 1D
- -3.83%
- 1M
- 7.68%
- 6M
- -42.43%
- YTD
- -43.92%
- 1Y
- -29.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.90%
KO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- YTD
- 26.97%
- 1Y
- 30.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.11M | $10.86M | $12.86M | |
| $1.49B | $1.47B | $1.44B |
BBW vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBW Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. | -43.92% | 35.39% | 105.62% | 2.79% | 22.13% | 385.45% | 31.79% | -17.97% | -57.07% | -33.09% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 26.97% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBW and KO is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2004 | 0.16 |
The correlation between BBW and KO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BBW:
$425.27M
KO:
$376.85B
BBW:
$4.25
KO:
$3.32
BBW:
7.98
KO:
26.39
BBW:
1.14
KO:
3.18
BBW:
0.84
KO:
7.54
BBW:
2.70
KO:
10.45
BBW:
$526.71M
KO:
$50.13B
BBW:
$302.52M
KO:
$31.02B
BBW:
$82.42M
KO:
$19.57B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBW vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank
BBW
KO
BBW vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBW | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.32 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 4.17 | -4.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 9.09 | -9.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBW vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBW drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBW and KO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBW | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.24% | -68.23% | -29.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.86% | -7.87% | -51.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.86% | -15.50% | -44.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.86% | -17.27% | -42.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.40% | -36.99% | -56.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.37% | -1.67% | -52.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.67% | -16.06% | -43.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.53% | 3.60% | +33.93% |
Volatility
BBW vs. KO - Volatility Comparison
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) has a higher volatility of 14.50% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 9.09%. This indicates that BBW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBW | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.50% | 9.09% | +5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.09% | 15.06% | +17.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.89% | 18.66% | +33.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.31% | 16.64% | +38.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.99% | 18.42% | +47.57% |
Dividends
BBW vs. KO - Dividend Comparison
BBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than KO's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBW Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. | 2.65% | 1.44% | 1.74% | 6.52% | 0.00% | 6.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.37% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
Financials
BBW vs. KO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BBW vs. KO - Profitability Comparison
BBW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.87M and revenue of 125.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 8.42B and revenue of 13.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.9%.
BBW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.75M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.67B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
BBW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a net income of 18.30M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 4.43B and revenue of 13.38B, resulting in a net margin of 33.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBW and KO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBW has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to KO (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBW dropped -97.24% vs KO's -68.23%.
KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBW and KO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer