PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBW vs. ROKU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BBW vs. ROKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) and Roku, Inc. (ROKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBW achieves a -49.50% return, which is significantly lower than ROKU's 24.49% return.


BBW

1D
-3.30%
1M
-16.80%
YTD
-49.50%
6M
-46.38%
1Y
-40.08%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
14.81%
10Y*
10.36%

ROKU

1D
-0.11%
1M
7.57%
YTD
24.49%
6M
22.39%
1Y
66.94%
3Y*
29.24%
5Y*
-20.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBW vs. ROKU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBW
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
-49.50%35.39%105.62%2.79%22.13%385.45%31.79%-17.97%-57.07%0.00%
ROKU
Roku, Inc.
24.49%45.94%-18.90%125.21%-82.16%-31.27%147.96%337.01%-40.83%228.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BBW and ROKU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BBW:

$388.77M

ROKU:

$20.40B

EPS

BBW:

$4.25

ROKU:

$1.34

PE Ratio

BBW:

7.23

ROKU:

101.12

PS Ratio

BBW:

0.76

ROKU:

4.10

PB Ratio

BBW:

2.44

ROKU:

7.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

BBW:

$526.71M

ROKU:

$4.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BBW:

$302.52M

ROKU:

$2.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

BBW:

$82.42M

ROKU:

$280.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBW vs. ROKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBW
BBW Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBW Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBW Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ROKU
ROKU Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ROKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKU Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKU Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBW vs. ROKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) and Roku, Inc. (ROKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBWROKUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.27

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

2.43

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

6.85

-8.07

BBW vs. ROKU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBW Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the ROKU Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBW and ROKU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBW vs. ROKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBW drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, which is greater than ROKU's maximum drawdown of -91.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBW and ROKU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBWROKUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.24%

-91.91%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.91%

-27.69%

-31.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.91%

-51.65%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.91%

-91.91%

+33.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.91%

-71.83%

+12.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.69%

-52.88%

-6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.86%

9.81%

+23.05%

Volatility

BBW vs. ROKU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) is 11.43%, while Roku, Inc. (ROKU) has a volatility of 20.88%. This indicates that BBW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROKU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBWROKUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.43%

20.88%

-9.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.50%

35.70%

-4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.78%

47.56%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.93%

67.01%

-11.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.85%

75.35%

-9.50%

Dividends

BBW vs. ROKU - Dividend Comparison

BBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while ROKU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BBW
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.
2.89%1.44%1.74%6.52%0.00%6.40%
ROKU
Roku, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BBW vs. ROKU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. and Roku, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
125.27M
1.25B
(BBW) Total Revenue
(ROKU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BBW vs. ROKU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. and Roku, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
63.8%
45.2%
Portfolio components
BBW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.87M and revenue of 125.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.

ROKU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a gross profit of 564.94M and revenue of 1.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.2%.

BBW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.75M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.

ROKU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported an operating income of 51.77M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

BBW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. reported a net income of 18.30M and revenue of 125.27M, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.

ROKU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Roku, Inc. reported a net income of 85.70M and revenue of 1.25B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BBW and ROKU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROKU has higher volatility (20.88%) compared to BBW (11.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBW dropped -97.24% vs ROKU's -91.91%.

ROKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBW and ROKU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer