BBUS vs. RPG
BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBUS returned 13.53%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for RPG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBUS charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.
Performance
BBUS vs. RPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 34.49% return.
BBUS
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- 26.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- —
RPG
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- 8.87%
- YTD
- 34.49%
- 6M
- 32.93%
- 1Y
- 44.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.97%
- 10Y*
- 15.20%
BBUS vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 9.75% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.26% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 34.49% | 13.41% | 28.23% | 8.04% | -27.55% | 29.40% | 29.34% | 13.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBUS and RPG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between BBUS and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBUS vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBUS
RPG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BBUS
RPG
Financial Services
BBUS
RPG
Communication Services
BBUS
RPG
Consumer Cyclical
BBUS
RPG
Healthcare
BBUS
RPG
Industrials
BBUS
RPG
Consumer Defensive
BBUS
RPG
Energy
BBUS
RPG
Utilities
BBUS
RPG
Real Estate
BBUS
RPG
Basic Materials
BBUS
RPG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBUS vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank
BBUS
RPG
BBUS vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBUS | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.37 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 4.09 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 15.48 | -2.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBUS vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and RPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBUS | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -53.27% | +17.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -11.08% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -24.75% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.46% | -35.59% | +10.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -0.19% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -8.83% | +3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.92% | -0.85% |
Volatility
BBUS vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) is 4.79%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that BBUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBUS | RPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 9.93% | -5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 18.46% | -8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 21.52% | -9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 23.76% | -6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 22.87% | -3.28% |
BBUS vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBUS vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison
BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than RPG's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.16% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBUS and RPG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RPG has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to BBUS (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs RPG's -53.27%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.53% vs 12.97% for RPG. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 12.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.16% for RPG.
BBUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.35% for RPG.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBUS and RPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer