PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSOX vs. FASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBSOX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSOX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, BBSOX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 2.48%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.


BBSOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
2.48%

FASGX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.93%
6M
12.90%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSOX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBSOX
BlackRock Short Obligations Fund
1.49%4.74%5.36%4.36%0.60%-0.10%1.54%3.01%1.96%1.18%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.93%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSOX and FASGX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBSOX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSOX
BBSOX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BBSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSOX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBSOXFASGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.20

2.61

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

11.68

3.64

+8.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

4.23

1.49

+2.74

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

21.50

3.39

+18.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

70.26

14.98

+55.29

BBSOX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSOX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBSOXFASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20

2.61

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.63

0.69

+1.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.42

0.79

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

0.63

+1.61

Drawdowns

BBSOX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSOX drawdown since its inception was -1.59%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSOX and FASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSOXFASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-47.35%

+45.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-7.95%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-12.80%

+12.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.00%

-23.54%

+22.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.59%

-27.20%

+25.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-6.71%

+6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

1.79%

-1.73%

Volatility

BBSOX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) is 0.40%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that BBSOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBSOXFASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

3.30%

-2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.88%

8.39%

-7.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

10.34%

-9.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.25%

12.27%

-11.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.03%

12.65%

-11.62%

BBSOX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSOX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBSOX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

BBSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than FASGX's 6.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBSOX
BlackRock Short Obligations Fund
4.25%4.43%5.01%3.35%1.29%0.30%1.13%2.56%2.24%1.17%1.03%0.62%
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBSOX and FASGX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to BBSOX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSOX dropped -1.59% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

BBSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBSOX and FASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer