PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSOX vs. CMGUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBSOX vs. CMGUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) and Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (CMGUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSOX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than CMGUX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, BBSOX has underperformed CMGUX with an annualized return of 2.48%, while CMGUX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.69% annualized return.


BBSOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
4.77%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
2.48%

CMGUX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.99%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
2.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSOX vs. CMGUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBSOX
BlackRock Short Obligations Fund
1.49%4.74%5.36%4.36%0.60%-0.10%1.54%3.01%1.96%1.18%
CMGUX
Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund
1.58%4.89%5.31%5.88%0.79%0.17%1.78%2.99%1.90%1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSOX and CMGUX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBSOX vs. CMGUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSOX
BBSOX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BBSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CMGUX
CMGUX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CMGUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMGUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMGUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CMGUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMGUX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSOX vs. CMGUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) and Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (CMGUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBSOXCMGUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.23

3.99

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.50

21.44

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

70.26

84.28

-14.02

BBSOX vs. CMGUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is comparable to the CMGUX Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSOX and CMGUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBSOXCMGUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20

3.30

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.63

2.85

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.42

2.43

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

1.81

+0.42

Drawdowns

BBSOX vs. CMGUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSOX drawdown since its inception was -1.59%, smaller than the maximum CMGUX drawdown of -3.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSOX and CMGUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSOXCMGUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.59%

-3.09%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-0.22%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.30%

-0.32%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.00%

-0.95%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.59%

-3.09%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.13%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

0.05%

+0.01%

Volatility

BBSOX vs. CMGUX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) has a higher volatility of 0.40% compared to Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (CMGUX) at 0.37%. This indicates that BBSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMGUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBSOXCMGUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

0.37%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.88%

0.97%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

1.40%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.25%

1.28%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.03%

1.11%

-0.08%

BBSOX vs. CMGUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSOX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CMGUX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBSOX vs. CMGUX - Dividend Comparison

BBSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than CMGUX's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBSOX
BlackRock Short Obligations Fund
4.25%4.43%5.01%3.35%1.29%0.30%1.13%2.56%2.24%1.17%1.03%0.62%
CMGUX
Columbia Ultra Short Term Bond Fund
4.39%4.65%4.07%3.46%1.34%0.61%1.53%2.50%1.99%1.24%0.87%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBSOX and CMGUX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBSOX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to CMGUX (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSOX dropped -1.59% vs CMGUX's -3.09%.

CMGUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 3.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBSOX and CMGUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer