BBSC vs. RYLD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BBSC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while RYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBSC returned 6.95%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for RYLD. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBSC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

BBSC vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 20.49% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 9.72% return.

BBSC

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 20.49%
• 6M: 17.40%
• 1Y: 38.10%
• 3Y*: 19.49%
• 5Y*: 6.95%
• 10Y*: —

RYLD

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 2.32%
• YTD: 9.72%
• 6M: 8.44%
• 1Y: 20.23%
• 3Y*: 8.79%
• 5Y*: 2.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSC vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF	20.49%	10.38%	12.31%	20.07%	-19.75%	15.44%	11.94%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	9.72%	5.65%	10.13%	0.27%	-13.03%	22.13%	3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSC and RYLD is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020	0.88

The correlation between BBSC and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBSC vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBSC	RYLD
Technology	20.3%	19.0%
Financial Services	16.7%	15.5%
Healthcare	15.5%	16.3%
Industrials	15.0%	18.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	8.0%
Real Estate	7.5%	5.9%
Energy	5.8%	5.4%
Basic Materials	4.0%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	2.3%
Communication Services	2.3%	2.4%
Utilities	1.2%	2.8%

Return for Risk

BBSC vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSC

BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 72
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 71
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSC vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBSC	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.91	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	2.70	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.40	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.01	3.23	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.12	13.04	+0.08

BBSC vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSC and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBSC vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBSC	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.96%	-41.53%	+10.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.54%	-6.29%	-3.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.32%	-19.05%	-10.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.96%	-21.33%	-9.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.32%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.38%	-8.77%	-2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	1.55%	+1.36%

Volatility

BBSC vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.00%. This indicates that BBSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBSC	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	2.00%	+3.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.39%	7.75%	+5.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.36%	10.65%	+8.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.97%	14.05%	+8.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.83%	17.15%	+5.68%

BBSC vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBSC vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than RYLD's 11.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF	1.01%	1.13%	1.29%	1.58%	1.37%	1.06%	0.18%	0.00%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.71%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBSC and RYLD in my portfolio?

BBSC and RYLD have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBSC or RYLD?

BBSC has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to RYLD (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSC dropped -30.96% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, BBSC or RYLD?

On 5-year performance, BBSC leads with 6.95% vs 2.48% for RYLD. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBSC or RYLD?

Over the 5-year period, BBSC has performed better with a 6.95% return vs 2.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBSC or RYLD?

BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBSC or RYLD?

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.71%, compared with 1.01% for BBSC.

What is the main difference between BBSC and RYLD?

BBSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RYLD is Derivative Income. BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while RYLD tracks CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBSC and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.