PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BBSC vs. SLYG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BBSCSLYG
YTD Return18.30%17.65%
1Y Return36.28%31.06%
3Y Return (Ann)2.21%1.93%
Sharpe Ratio1.981.90
Sortino Ratio2.842.78
Omega Ratio1.341.33
Calmar Ratio1.871.81
Martin Ratio11.8111.83
Ulcer Index3.72%3.20%
Daily Std Dev22.16%19.92%
Max Drawdown-30.96%-63.19%
Current Drawdown-2.72%-2.13%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between BBSC and SLYG is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BBSC vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BBSC having a 18.30% return and SLYG slightly lower at 17.65%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.81%
11.29%
BBSC
SLYG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BBSC vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
Expense ratio chart for SLYG: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for BBSC: current value at 0.09% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.09%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BBSC vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBSC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BBSC, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.98
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BBSC, currently valued at 2.84, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BBSC, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.34
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BBSC, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BBSC, currently valued at 11.81, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0011.81
SLYG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLYG, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.90
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLYG, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.78
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLYG, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLYG, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.81
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLYG, currently valued at 11.83, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0011.83

BBSC vs. SLYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the SLYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSC and SLYG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.98
1.90
BBSC
SLYG

Dividends

BBSC vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison

BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than SLYG's 1.03% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.24%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
1.03%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%4.42%0.62%

Drawdowns

BBSC vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -63.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and SLYG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.72%
-2.13%
BBSC
SLYG

Volatility

BBSC vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) have volatilities of 7.76% and 7.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.76%
7.42%
BBSC
SLYG