BBSC vs. SLYG
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG).
BBSC and SLYG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBSC is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. It was launched on Nov 16, 2020. SLYG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2000. Both BBSC and SLYG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBSC or SLYG.
Correlation
The correlation between BBSC and SLYG is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BBSC vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BBSC:
0.74
SLYG:
0.69
BBSC:
1.17
SLYG:
1.10
BBSC:
1.14
SLYG:
1.13
BBSC:
0.96
SLYG:
0.92
BBSC:
4.04
SLYG:
3.82
BBSC:
3.91%
SLYG:
3.47%
BBSC:
21.29%
SLYG:
19.20%
BBSC:
-30.96%
SLYG:
-63.19%
BBSC:
-7.79%
SLYG:
-8.61%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than SLYG's 10.92% return.
BBSC
13.26%
-2.70%
15.47%
13.71%
N/A
N/A
SLYG
10.92%
-3.78%
8.95%
13.23%
8.38%
9.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBSC vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBSC vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BBSC vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison
BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than SLYG's 0.79% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 0.78% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.06% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.79% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% | 4.42% | 0.62% |
Drawdowns
BBSC vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -63.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and SLYG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BBSC vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) at 5.91%. This indicates that BBSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.