BBSC vs. OUSM
BBSC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and OUSM (OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - BBSC tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index while OUSM tracks the O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBSC returned 6.64%/yr vs 7.39%/yr for OUSM. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBSC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSM.
Performance
BBSC vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than OUSM's 6.80% return.
BBSC
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 35.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
OUSM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- —
BBSC vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 15.75% | 10.38% | 12.31% | 20.07% | -19.75% | 15.44% | 11.94% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 6.80% | 2.17% | 13.45% | 18.82% | -7.89% | 21.45% | 4.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSC and OUSM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between BBSC and OUSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBSC vs. OUSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBSC
OUSM
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
BBSC
OUSM
Financial Services
BBSC
OUSM
Healthcare
BBSC
OUSM
Industrials
BBSC
OUSM
Consumer Cyclical
BBSC
OUSM
Real Estate
BBSC
OUSM
-
Energy
BBSC
OUSM
Basic Materials
BBSC
OUSM
Consumer Defensive
BBSC
OUSM
Communication Services
BBSC
OUSM
Utilities
BBSC
OUSM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBSC vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank
BBSC
OUSM
BBSC vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBSC | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.15 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 1.19 | +2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | 3.47 | +8.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBSC | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 0.83 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.46 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.48 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
BBSC vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum OUSM drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and OUSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBSC | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -39.84% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.54% | -9.21% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.32% | -19.44% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.96% | -19.44% | -11.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -1.67% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.49% | -5.22% | -6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.14% | -0.22% |
Volatility
BBSC vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) at 3.66%. This indicates that BBSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBSC | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 3.66% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 9.25% | +3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 13.15% | +5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 16.30% | +6.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 18.94% | +3.92% |
BBSC vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSM's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBSC vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison
BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than OUSM's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.06% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 2.07% | 2.09% | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.98% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 2.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBSC and OUSM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBSC has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to OUSM (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSC dropped -30.96% vs OUSM's -39.84%.
On 5-year performance, OUSM leads with 7.39% vs 6.64% for BBSC. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OUSM has performed better with a 7.39% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.
OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.03% for BBSC.
BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBSC and 0.48% for OUSM.
BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBSC and OUSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer