BBSB vs. CSHI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI).

BBSB and CSHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBSB is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (1-3 Y). It was launched on Apr 19, 2023. CSHI is a passively managed fund by Neos that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Aug 29, 2022. Both BBSB and CSHI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BBSB vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BBSB vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBSB Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF	0.28%	5.12%	4.00%	2.56%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	1.30%	5.05%	5.66%	4.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSB achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than CSHI's 1.30% return.

BBSB

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 6M: 1.38%
• 1Y: 3.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHI

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 5.43%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSB vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.

CSHI

Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF

BBSB

Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF

Return for Risk

BBSB vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSB

BBSB Risk / Return Rank: 96
BBSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BBSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BBSB Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BBSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BBSB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 97
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSB vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBSB	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	2.71	-0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.14	4.01	+0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	2.01	-0.47
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.43	3.21	+1.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.33	28.78	-11.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBSB vs. CSHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the CSHI Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSB and CSHI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBSB	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	2.71	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.42	4.10	-1.68

Correlation

The correlation between BBSB and CSHI is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

BBSB vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

BBSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than CSHI's 4.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBSB Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF	3.88%	3.69%	4.84%	3.50%	0.00%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.98%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%

Drawdowns

BBSB vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSB drawdown since its inception was -1.57%, smaller than the maximum CSHI drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSB and CSHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBSB	CSHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-1.69%	+0.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.86%	-1.69%	+0.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	0.00%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-0.03%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.22%	0.19%	+0.03%

Volatility

BBSB vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison

Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) has a higher volatility of 0.51% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) at 0.39%. This indicates that BBSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBSB	CSHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.51%	0.39%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.83%	0.68%	+0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46%	2.01%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.69%	1.35%	+0.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.69%	1.35%	+0.34%