PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBMC vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBMC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return.


BBMC

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.92%
6M
12.12%
YTD
16.85%
1Y
28.27%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.34%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.42M$1.38M$2.65M
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

BBMC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
16.85%12.24%15.15%18.37%-19.77%17.64%62.09%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%33.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BBMC and VOO is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020

0.85

The correlation between BBMC and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBMC vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBMC
VOO

Industrials

22.8%
8.5%

Technology

15.0%
38.6%

Financial Services

12.9%
11.4%

Healthcare

12.9%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
9.5%

Real Estate

6.7%
1.8%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.0%

Communication Services

3.4%
9.9%

Utilities

2.7%
2.2%

Industrials

BBMC
22.8%
VOO
8.5%

Technology

BBMC
15.0%
VOO
38.6%

Financial Services

BBMC
12.9%
VOO
11.4%

Healthcare

BBMC
12.9%
VOO
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BBMC
11.8%
VOO
9.5%

Real Estate

BBMC
6.7%
VOO
1.8%

Basic Materials

BBMC
4.4%
VOO
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

BBMC
4.0%
VOO
4.5%

Energy

BBMC
3.5%
VOO
3.0%

Communication Services

BBMC
3.4%
VOO
9.9%

Utilities

BBMC
2.7%
VOO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBMC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBMC
BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBMC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBMCVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.21

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.59

9.44

+1.15

BBMC vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMC and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBMC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBMCVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-33.99%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-8.90%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.18%

-18.69%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.11%

-24.52%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-1.38%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-3.67%

-5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.08%

+0.44%

Volatility

BBMC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is 3.29%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that BBMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBMCVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.54%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.64%

10.10%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.79%

12.82%

+3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.58%

16.93%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

18.01%

+2.94%

BBMC vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBMC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.14%1.25%1.31%1.36%1.48%0.87%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBMC and VOO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to BBMC (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 12.83% vs 8.30% for BBMC. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BBMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBMC.

BBMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.

BBMC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.03% for VOO.

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBMC and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer