PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBLU vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBLU vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLU achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 14.87% return.


BBLU

1D
0.47%
1M
6.20%
YTD
11.14%
6M
12.02%
1Y
31.09%
3Y*
23.43%
5Y*
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-0.15%
1M
8.31%
YTD
14.87%
6M
14.92%
1Y
36.19%
3Y*
28.58%
5Y*
16.62%
10Y*
18.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLU vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BBLU
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF
11.14%18.40%27.47%31.11%6.20%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
14.87%22.09%35.99%30.02%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLU and SPYG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022

0.85

The correlation between BBLU and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBLU vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBLU
SPYG

Technology

29.3%
51.9%

Financial Services

15.9%
8.5%

Communication Services

14.6%
16.8%

Healthcare

12.5%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.6%
1.0%

Energy

6.1%
0.1%

Industrials

2.1%
5.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Technology

BBLU
29.3%
SPYG
51.9%

Financial Services

BBLU
15.9%
SPYG
8.5%

Communication Services

BBLU
14.6%
SPYG
16.8%

Healthcare

BBLU
12.5%
SPYG
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BBLU
9.8%
SPYG
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

BBLU
9.6%
SPYG
1.0%

Energy

BBLU
6.1%
SPYG
0.1%

Industrials

BBLU
2.1%
SPYG
5.0%

Basic Materials

BBLU

-

SPYG
0.3%

Real Estate

BBLU

-

SPYG
0.6%

Utilities

BBLU

-

SPYG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBLU vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLU
BBLU Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLU vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBLUSPYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.80

2.27

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.94

3.07

+0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.39

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

2.71

+1.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.61

11.22

+6.39

BBLU vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLU and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBLUSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.27

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.83

0.36

+1.47

Drawdowns

BBLU vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLU drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLU and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBLUSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-67.63%

+50.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-13.76%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.20%

-22.14%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-24.33%

+22.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

3.32%

-1.51%

Volatility

BBLU vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) is 2.71%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that BBLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBLUSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

4.15%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

12.43%

-4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

16.04%

-4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

21.17%

-6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.53%

20.65%

-6.12%

BBLU vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBLU vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

BBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than SPYG's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBLU
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF
1.13%1.25%1.39%1.68%32.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.46%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBLU and SPYG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to BBLU (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLU dropped -17.20% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 3-year performance, SPYG leads with 28.58% vs 23.43% for BBLU. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBLU has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 28.58% return vs 23.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BBLU.

BBLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.46% for SPYG.

BBLU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBLU and 0.04% for SPYG.

BBLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBLU and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer