PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBLU vs. PBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBLU vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBLU having a 9.17% return and PBUS slightly higher at 9.61%.


BBLU

1D
-0.95%
1M
1.34%
6M
8.89%
YTD
9.17%
1Y
21.19%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
10Y*

PBUS

1D
-0.90%
1M
0.68%
6M
8.05%
YTD
9.61%
1Y
19.42%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLU vs. PBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BBLU
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF
9.17%18.40%27.47%31.11%6.39%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
9.61%17.58%24.99%27.33%7.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLU and PBUS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2022

0.90

The correlation between BBLU and PBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBLU vs. PBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBLU
PBUS

Technology

27.7%
38.9%

Financial Services

16.4%
10.9%

Healthcare

14.5%
8.4%

Communication Services

14.0%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

10.0%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.9%

Energy

4.9%
3.2%

Industrials

2.6%
8.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Technology

BBLU
27.7%
PBUS
38.9%

Financial Services

BBLU
16.4%
PBUS
10.9%

Healthcare

BBLU
14.5%
PBUS
8.4%

Communication Services

BBLU
14.0%
PBUS
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

BBLU
10.0%
PBUS
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BBLU
9.8%
PBUS
9.9%

Energy

BBLU
4.9%
PBUS
3.2%

Industrials

BBLU
2.6%
PBUS
8.1%

Basic Materials

BBLU

-

PBUS
1.7%

Real Estate

BBLU

-

PBUS
1.8%

Utilities

BBLU

-

PBUS
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBLU vs. PBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLU
BBLU Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PBUS
PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLU vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBLUPBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.16

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

9.22

+1.45

BBLU vs. PBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the PBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLU and PBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBLU vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLU drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum PBUS drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLU and PBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBLUPBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-33.15%

+15.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-9.02%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.20%

-19.07%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-1.73%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-5.08%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.11%

-0.12%

Volatility

BBLU vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) is 3.03%, while Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that BBLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBLUPBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

3.27%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

10.20%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

12.79%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.46%

17.16%

-2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.46%

19.28%

-4.82%

BBLU vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBLU vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison

BBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than PBUS's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBLU
Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF
1.15%1.25%1.39%1.68%32.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
1.03%1.05%1.20%1.36%1.71%0.98%1.35%1.53%2.33%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBLU and PBUS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBUS has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to BBLU (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLU dropped -17.20% vs PBUS's -33.15%.

On 3-year performance, BBLU leads with 20.22% vs 19.48% for PBUS. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBLU has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BBLU has performed better with a 20.22% return vs 19.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BBLU.

BBLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 1.03% for PBUS.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBLU and 0.04% for PBUS.

BBLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBLU and PBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer