BBJP vs. FLJH
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH).
BBJP and FLJH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBJP is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Jun 15, 2018. FLJH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both BBJP and FLJH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BBJP vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BBJP vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 7.19% | 26.55% | 7.47% | 20.65% | -17.24% | 1.21% | 15.42% | 18.85% | -13.92% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 9.29% | 25.26% | 25.89% | 36.02% | -2.75% | 12.68% | 10.65% | 20.34% | -14.94% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBJP achieves a 7.19% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 9.29% return.
BBJP
- 1D
- 2.53%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 12.46%
- 1Y
- 33.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- —
FLJH
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 17.51%
- 1Y
- 40.53%
- 3Y*
- 28.77%
- 5Y*
- 18.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBJP vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBJP has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BBJP vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank
BBJP
FLJH
BBJP vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBJP | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.53 | 1.77 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.17 | 2.43 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 3.32 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.93 | 12.34 | -3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBJP | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 1.77 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 1.00 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.69 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between BBJP and FLJH is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BBJP vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison
BBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than FLJH's 3.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 5.01% | 5.37% | 2.80% | 3.05% | 1.52% | 2.89% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 0.65% | 0.00% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 3.57% | 3.90% | 5.06% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
BBJP vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBJP drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBJP and FLJH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBJP | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.66% | -31.51% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.60% | -11.83% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.66% | -20.39% | -12.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.88% | -5.01% | -2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.61% | -5.39% | -3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 3.19% | +0.47% |
Volatility
BBJP vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 7.76%. This indicates that BBJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BBJP | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.95% | 7.76% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.93% | 14.50% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.97% | 23.00% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 18.50% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 19.90% | -1.63% |